AI super agents are advanced tools powered by large language models (LLMs). They go beyond simple chatbots by handling complex tasks like research, coding, automation, and even real-world actions like making phone calls. Think of them as super-smart assistants that can think, plan, and act on their own. In 2025, three big players stand out: ChatGPT’s Super Agent, Genspark Super Agent, and Manus AI. Let’s explore each one.
ChatGPT AI Super Agent: The All-Rounder
ChatGPT, created by OpenAI, is a household name in AI. Its Super Agent, launched in 2025, combines features like Operator and Deep Research to tackle multi-step tasks. Whether you need it to browse the web, write code, create spreadsheets, or make presentations, it’s got you covered.
Key Features of ChatGPT Super Agent
- Conversational Power: Excels at understanding and responding to complex questions in a natural, human-like way.
- Deep Research: Can analyze web data, summarize findings, and provide detailed answers.
- Task Versatility: Handles coding, document creation, and research with ease.
- Performance: Scores 44% on the HLE benchmark, showing strong conversational and reasoning skills.
Why It Stands Out
ChatGPT’s Super Agent is great for users who want a reliable, all-purpose AI. It’s perfect for students, professionals, or anyone needing quick answers or help with research-heavy tasks. Its voice mode (available on mobile apps) makes it feel like talking to a real person.
Limitations
- May not have as many specialized tools as competitors.
- Lacks real-world interaction features like making phone calls.
- Performance on technical tasks might not match dedicated platforms.
Genspark Super Agent: The Speedy Innovator
Genspark, launched by Palo Alto-based MainFunc in early 2025, is making waves with its “Mixture of Agents” approach. It uses nine specialized LLMs and over 80 tools to handle a wide range of tasks, from creating videos to booking restaurant tables.
Key Features of Genspark Super Agent
- Speed and Autonomy: Completes tasks quickly with minimal user input.
- Creative Tools: Can generate videos, websites, presentations, and more.
- Real-World Actions: Makes phone calls for tasks like reservations or checking stock.
- Performance: Scores an impressive 87.8% on the GAIA benchmark, showing strong task-handling skills.
- Accessibility: Offers a free tier with 200 daily credits and no waitlist, making it easy to try.
Why It Stands Out
Genspark is a dream for creative professionals and small businesses. Need a quick video for your brand or a website mockup? Genspark can do it in minutes. Its ability to handle real-world tasks, like calling a restaurant, sets it apart from typical AI tools.
Limitations
- Less focus on deep conversational skills compared to ChatGPT.
- May not be as strong for highly technical tasks like advanced coding.
- Still a newer platform, so long-term reliability is untested.
Manus AI: The Technical Powerhouse
Developed by Chinese startup Monica and launched in March 2025, Manus AI is built for technical users. It uses two LLMs, including Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet, and integrates with platforms like Hugging Face for advanced workflows.
Key Features of Manus AI
- Technical Expertise: Excels at coding, system automation, and multi-domain tasks.
- Persistent Memory: Remembers past interactions for consistent workflows.
- Performance: Scores 86% on the GAIA benchmark, just below Genspark.
- Developer Tools: Integrates with APIs and platforms for custom solutions.
- Customization: Ideal for advanced users who need tailored workflows.
Why It Stands Out
Manus is a go-to for developers and businesses needing complex automation or coding solutions. Its ability to handle multi-step technical tasks makes it a favorite for enterprise users.
Limitations
- Slower than Genspark and requires more user input.
- Accessibility is limited due to a waitlist and possible $9/month plan.
- Less intuitive for beginners compared to ChatGPT or Genspark.
ChatGPT vs. Manus vs. Genspark: Head-to-Head Comparison
Let’s break down how these AI agents stack up in key areas.
1. Autonomy and Speed
- Genspark: Fastest and most autonomous, needing minimal prompts.
- ChatGPT: Strong autonomy but slower for multi-step tasks.
- Manus: Less autonomous, often requiring detailed user instructions.
Winner: Genspark for speed and independence.
2. Ease of Use
- Genspark: Super beginner-friendly with an intuitive interface and free tier.
- ChatGPT: Easy to use, especially for conversational tasks, with wide platform access.
- Manus: Best for advanced users but less approachable for beginners.
Winner: Genspark for accessibility, ChatGPT for versatility.
3. Task Suitability
- Genspark: Best for creative tasks (videos, websites) and real-world actions (phone calls).
- ChatGPT: Ideal for research, writing, and general-purpose tasks.
- Manus: Perfect for coding, automation, and technical workflows.
Winner: Depends on your needs—Genspark for creativity, Manus for technical tasks, ChatGPT for all-around use.
4. Accessibility and Cost
- Genspark: Free tier with 200 daily credits, no waitlist.
- ChatGPT: Free tier with limited quotas;
- Manus: Waitlist and possible $9/month plan, less accessible.
Winner: Genspark for instant access and generous free tier.
5. Performance Benchmarks
- Genspark: 87.8% on GAIA benchmark.
- Manus: 86% on GAIA benchmark.
- ChatGPT: 44% on HLE benchmark (different metric, so not directly comparable).
Winner: Genspark slightly edges out Manus; ChatGPT’s score is less relevant due to benchmark differences.
Does ChatGPT Really “Destroy” Manus and Genspark?
The claim that ChatGPT’s Super Agent “destroys” Manus and Genspark comes from an X post and seems like a catchy way to grab attention. In reality, no single AI agent dominates in every area. Here’s the truth:
- ChatGPT is a fantastic all-rounder, perfect for conversational tasks, research, and general productivity. It’s widely available and easy to use, but it doesn’t match Genspark’s speed or Manus’s technical depth.
- Genspark shines for creative and real-world tasks, with unmatched speed and a free tier that’s hard to beat. It’s ideal for users who want quick results without a steep learning curve.
- Manus is the go-to for developers and businesses needing advanced automation or coding. It’s powerful but less accessible and slower than competitors.
If you’re looking for a one-size-fits-all solution, ChatGPT is a safe bet. For creative or fast-paced tasks, Genspark takes the lead. For technical projects, Manus is your best choice.
Which AI Agent Should You Choose?
Your choice depends on what you need:
- For Students or Writers: ChatGPT’s Super Agent is great for research, essays, and quick answers.
- For Creatives or Small Businesses: Genspark’s ability to create videos, websites, and handle real-world tasks makes it a top pick.
- For Developers or Enterprises: Manus AI’s technical prowess and customization options are unbeatable.
Try their free tiers to see which one fits your workflow. Genspark’s no-waitlist policy makes it easy to jump in, while ChatGPT’s wide availability is a big plus. Manus might require a wait, so plan ahead if you’re leaning that way.
The “ChatGPT AI Super Agent DESTROYS Manus and Genspark” claim is more hype than reality. Each AI agent has its own strengths, and none of them truly “destroys” the others. In 2025, the AI landscape is all about finding the right tool for the job. Whether you need ChatGPT’s versatility, Genspark’s speed, or Manus’s technical power, there’s an AI agent for you.
